Aquaponics Digest - Sun 01/10/99




Message   1: Re: Feed Mixtures (was Re: Cloning!!!)

             from Gordon Watkins 

Message   2: Feed for Fish

             from ClemWehner 

Message   3: FW: terminator technology

             from Martha Sundquist 

Message   4: Re: Feed Mixtures (was Re: Cloning!!!)

             from MUDDTOO

Message   5: Re: Feed for Fish

             from "Susanne Machler" 

Message   6: Re: FW: terminator technology

             from "Jim Sealy Jr." 

Message   7: Re: FW: terminator technology

             from "KevinLReed" 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 1                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Feed Mixtures (was Re: Cloning!!!)

From:    Gordon Watkins 

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:26:42 -0600

Maybe you can help deter thievery by adding a few Pacu (Colossoma sp.) to

your ponds and then spreading the word that they're actually pirahna, which

they closely resemble and are in fact related to. They grow fast (much

faster than tilapia) and are really tasty. Sort of like putting those "theft

deterrant activated" stickers on your car whether you really have one or

not.

    I've not tried soy beans although they certainly have good potential as

a fish meal substitute. Studies indicate that supplementation of soy-based

diets with calcium phosphate and/or methionine significantly improves

tilapia growth. . Also, raw soybeans contain a trypsin inhibitor which ,

"...can cause a problem when soybean meal is used at high levels in fish

feed." Boiling or otherwise heating the meal will eliminate the problem.

                                Gordon

Susanne Machler wrote:

>

>

> 2)Does anyone out there have any interesting and environmentally

> friendly solutions to the problems of larceny of fish? (Apart from

> pitbulls..)

>

>  . We have some very

> prolific bean types here, high in protein, and carbohydrates.Gordon can

> I read out of your reply that you havent already tried soya? Doesnt that

> do well in your part of the world??

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 2                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Feed for Fish

From:    ClemWehner 

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:01:01 -0800 (PST)

Possible basic ingredients for fish rations are flax,

hemp and sunflower seeds. These are principal components of 

a product we make for humans that aims to deliver a 

recommended daily intake of essential fatty acids, 

primarily Omega 3 (alpha linolenic acid, ALA) and

secondarily Omega 6 (linolenic acid, LA). Requirements

of these EFA's are known for commercial freshwater and

marine fish species.

Of interest to aquaponics are freshwater species

such as:

        

        Trout-type: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

                    that require 1.0% dry diet ALA

                        and

        Tilapia-type: (Tilapia zilli and T. nilotica)

                    that require 1.0% dry diet LA.

Flax seed would probably be the best choice because

1) it's cheap and readily avalable, 2) stores well,

3) has the highest Omega 3 content, 4) easily ground

(in a coffee mill) and 5) when ground to nibbling size

for fish, it floats first then sinks slowly and does

not leave any oily slick on water surface. (Flax seed

has a mucilage coating; if the coating is not removed

or the seed ground it goes straight through fish or

human gastrointestinal tracts. Yet when ground provides

good fiber which fish usually don't get in their diet).

Hemp seed is not readily available in the U.S.; sunflower

seed has no Omega 3 but good amounts of Omega 6 and 

Vitamin E.

Studies have been done and reported in "Flaxseed in 

Arctic Char and Rainbow Trout Nutrition", Flaxseed

in Human Nutrition, Cunnane S. Thompson I. ed,

AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1997. It should be noted

that those studies sought to determine if flax

seed would influence fish rate of growth. Sometimes 

it did. More important to aquaculture, though, would

be to determine if flax seed could increase the amount of

Omega 3 gleaned from this feed ingredient, then stored

in fish muscle to be passed along to humans.

In the wild, cold water fish species get their

Omega 3 from phytoplankton. Warm water species,

like Tilapia, get Omega 6. In other words, the 

EFA's are gathred from plant sources, not manufactured

by fish.

Theory is that if both Trout and Tilapia raised

in aquaculture had a good source (more concentrated 

than in what's in phytoplankton) of Omega 3 and

Omega 6 in their feed, say from flax seed, they

would store much more of these EFA's in their flesh

to pass along to consumers. (Maybe Tilapia, as do Trout,

might store the prized Omega 3 as well as Omega 6).

Wouldn't that be something!

For more information visit:

http://www.farmersmarketonline.com/health.htm 

Yours truly,

Clem Wehner

Nutrition Manager       Don Nacho's Foods International

                        Victoria, BC, Canada V9A 3K2

                        Ph/Fx: 250-383-1959

                        cww@pacificcoast.net 

 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 3                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: FW: terminator technology

From:    Martha Sundquist 

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:05:47 -0600

Hello, I got this in my mail today, and wondered if anyone else had seen this. 

Am going to go to those sites and check this out, but it sounds scary, am I way 

out on being worried about this from the garden aspect of life? Martha

>>

>>-------------------------------------------------------

>>STOP DANGEROUS PLANT-CASTRATING "TERMINATOR TECHNOLOGY"

>>-------------------------------------------------------

>>

>>December 18th, 1998

>>

>>To whom it should concern:

>>

>>Hi.  My name is Bob Mueller.  I'm not a paid activist, nor am I

>>really an activist at all, aside from the fact that I've been

>>jostled out of complacency enough to write this alert.  I am,

>>however, an ordinary citizen who is quite unsettled by one

>>specific issue:  U.S. Patent 5,723,765, entitled "Control of

>>Plant Gene Expression".  The patent covers technology referred to

>>as a plant "Technology Protection System" (TPS), otherwise known

as

>>Terminator Technology.

>>

>>My goal is simple:  to share my concern with you, in the hope

>>that you will be alarmed enough to more completely educate

yourself

>>regarding this matter.  For if I can accomplish this, I am

>>convinced, you will surely ACT.

>>

>>The USDA, spending public money, has developed a technology

>>whereby seeds can be stripped of their ability to propagate.

>>They are in the process of patenting the process worldwide on

>>behalf of Monsanto, through a subsidiary (Delta and Pine Land

>>Company).

>>

>>The driving force behind the Terminator technology is the ability

>>for Monsanto, and Delta and Pine Land Co., to protect their

>>"inventions" from being "duplicated" unlawfully, which, granted,

>>sounds appropriate and fair.

>>

>>The result, however, will be to replace natural crops worldwide,

>>with genetically enhanced, superior, high yield crops.  Superior,

>>that is, except for the fact that they can no longer reproduce

>>themselves, effectively forcing farmers worldwide to buy their

>>seeds annually from Monsanto...the world's only supplier.

>>

>>The patent applies to ALL PLANTS.

>>

>>This is the ultimate in Capitalism.  We're going to remove

>>nature's ability to propagate herself, so we can charge money for

>>that privilege.

>>

>>However, I only wish this were the full extent of the issue.

>>The part that pushes my button; the part that really unnerves me,

>>is the probability that, for all their careful planning, this

>>genetically altered organism will share its suicidal genes with

>>OTHER plant species.

>>

>>Most children know about the "birds and the bees" ...

>>

>>Indeed, Martha L. Crouch, Associate Professor of Biology at

>>Indiana University, has published a series of papers specifying

>>how the resulting castrated plants WILL be able to sterilize

>>nearby normal species, via the spread of Terminator pollen.  Not

>>only that, but how these plants will be able to actually *pass*

>>the toxin gene to other plant species through cross-pollination:

>>

>>> when farmers plant the Terminator seeds, the

>>> seeds already will have been treated with

>>> tetracycline, and thus the recombinase will

>>> have acted, and the toxin coding sequence will

>>> be next to the seed-specific promoter, and

>>> will be ready to act when the end of seed

>>> development comes around. The seeds will grow

>>> into plants, and make pollen.  Every pollen

>>> grain will carry a ready-to-act toxin gene. If

>>> the Terminator crop is next to a field planted

>>> in a normal variety, and pollen is taken by

>>> insects or the wind to that field, any

>>> eggs fertilized by the Terminator pollen will

>>> now have one toxin gene. It will be activated

>>> late in that seed's development, and the seed

>>> will die.  However, it is unlikely that the

>>> person growing the normal variety will be able

>>> to tell, because the seed will probably look

>>> normal. Only when that seed is planted, and

>>> doesn't germinate, will the change become

>>> apparent.

>>

>>> In most cases, the toxin gene will not be

>>> passed on any further, because dead plants

>>> don't reproduce. However, under certain

>>> conditions I will discuss later, it is

>>> possible for the toxin gene to be inherited.

>>

>>http://www.bio.indiana.edu/people/terminator.html

>>

>>Yet this "product" has been virtually assured of being passed as

>>safe, in the USDA's own words:  "These approvals are expected

>>because there appear to be no crop or food safety risks to the

>>new technology. There also appear to be no environmental risks."

>>

>>http://www.rafi.org/translator/termtrans.html

>>

>>Now why would the USDA come to this conclusion on a technology

>>that has only been tested by those having a vested interest in

>>its commercial success?

>>

>>Could it be because it's worth an estimated 1.5 billion dollars

>>a year in licensing fees alone, and the USDA is LICENSING the

>>technology to Monsanto?

>>

>>Awesome economics on a global scale.  Patent has been applied for

>>in 87 countries.

>>

>>Please, please, go to the following web page, and read the data...

>>both sides of the story.  There are many more potential problems

>>with this technology than I have outlined here.  Follow the links.

>>Assure yourself that you are, indeed, awake, for you may be

>>tempted to think this is merely a bad dream-or a science-

fiction

>>story.

>>

>>http://www.rafi.org/usda.html

>>

>>If you are as affected by the nature of this venture as I was, at

>>the very least, please use the RAFI site to model a letter of

>>protest that will be sent simultaneously to the Secretary of the

>>US Department of Agriculture, the Administrator of the USDA

>>Agricultural Research Service, the Chair of the US House of

>>Representatives Agriculture Committee, and the Chair of the US

>>Senate Agriculture Committee.

>>

>>This technology has NOT yet been commercialized.  We are, in

>>fact, in the uncommon position of being able to say no before it

>>becomes widespread-pun intended.

>>

>>I hope I have convinced you to examine this issue.

>>

>>As a concerned individual, I thank you for your time.

>>

>>Bob Mueller   10/18/98

>>bobm@lightspeed.wa.com

>>

>>

>>(Again, I am in no way affiliated with the above web sites or any

>>organized "campaign" against this technology.   I write to inform.

>>Please feel free to forward this notice to your family and friends.

>>Post where appropriate.  However, I ask that this message be

posted

>or forwarded in its entirety, without editing.)

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 4                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Feed Mixtures (was Re: Cloning!!!)

From:    MUDDTOO

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 22:59:56 EST

In a message dated 99-01-10 11:33:59 EST, you write:

<< Susanne Machler wrote:

 >

 > 2)Does anyone out there have any interesting and environmentally

 > friendly solutions to the problems of larceny of fish? (Apart from

 > pitbulls..) >>

Hello,

I read an interesting article where a fellow used a common area sensor, the

type used to turn your porch light on when someone comes close, and connected

it to a sprinkler valve instead.  Whenever rabbits would come close to his

garden the rain bird type sprinkler would come on and  hose them off.

On a more permanent fix:  Miracle-Gro sells a brass attachment for your hose

that allows you to draw concentated fertilizer from a bucket while your

watering.  

Suppose a person used concentrated colored dye instead, along with the setup

above.  What fun it would be to go to town and see the RED faces  Blue would

work good too.  :}

Joel

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 5                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Feed for Fish

From:    "Susanne Machler" 

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 20:48:32 PST

Stuff like this gets me going places...

Keep it coming and thanks guys....

Sue..

Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:01:01 -0800 (PST)

To: aquaponics@townsqr.com

From: ClemWehner 

Subject: Feed for Fish

Reply-To: aquaponics@townsqr.com

Possible basic ingredients for fish rations are flax,

hemp and sunflower seeds. These are principal components of 

a product we make for humans that aims to deliver a 

recommended daily intake of essential fatty acids, 

primarily Omega 3 (alpha linolenic acid, ALA) and

secondarily Omega 6 (linolenic acid, LA). 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 6                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: FW: terminator technology

From:    "Jim Sealy Jr." 

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 22:54:15 -0600

This piece of mail is getting to be as bad as the 'Good Times virus'

mail. It'll keep going around scaring folks forever I'm afraid.

Jim

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 7                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: FW: terminator technology

From:    "KevinLReed" 

Date:    Sun, 10 Jan 1999 21:16:27 -0800

Hello again,

This stuff scares me too. Last year in California 200,011 tons of pesticides

were put on

commecial crops alone. 80% to 90% of the pesticide has been shown to migrate

off of the fields and so some must be getting into the local communities air

and water supply.

Transgenic plants that express BT analogues could eliminate this entirerly.

How many kids living near these fields might never have asthma, bronchitis

or lung cancer if this were done. I wonder.

Kevin



Back to Index