Aquaponics Digest - Sun 01/24/99




Message   1: Re: Organics Gaining Ground Approval

             from Adriana Gutierrez 

Message   2: Re: Ted  

             from "Lloyd R. Prentice" 

Message   3: Re: Ted  

             from Marc 

Message   4: vaccine

             from William Evans 

Message   5: test

             from William Evans 

Message   6: Thinking of Unsubscribing

             from Michael Strates 

Message   7: Model rocketry---Re: Thinking of Unsubscribing

             from William Evans 

Message   8: Re: Chicken Poop

             from doelle 

Message   9: Re: Chicken Poop

             from doelle 

Message  10: Re: Animal waste

             from doelle 

Message  11: Re: Model rocketry---Re: Thinking of Unsubscribing

             from Michael Strates 

Message  12: Glowing cash crop

             from "KevinLReed" 

Message  13: Re: Ted  

             from doelle 

Message  14: Re: Organics Gaining Ground Approval

             from doelle 

Message  15: Animal waste

             from Colin Johnston 

Message  16: Chicken Poop

             from Colin Johnston 

Message  17: Re: Ted  

             from Michael Strates 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 1                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Organics Gaining Ground Approval

From:    Adriana Gutierrez 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 03:19:18 -0500

Dave,

Did you by any chance to see whether sewage sludge is allowed

under the proposed regulations?

Adriana

Dave Miller wrote:

> 

> Has any one read the newer (revised) proposals for organic standards due

> out this year?

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 2                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Ted  

From:    "Lloyd R. Prentice" 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 10:02:33 -0500

Though I'll miss Ted's knowledge and insight, I second the motion.

Best wishes,

Lloyd R. Prentice

Adriana Gutierrez wrote:

> 

> Horst,

> 

> We do appreciate your insight.  Please don't refrain from jumping

> in without being asked.  For those who find a topic weird or

> unhappy just hit the trash button and move on...

> 

> Adriana

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 3                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Ted  

From:    Marc 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:23:49 -0700

Hi Horst,

I appreciate your input(s) and tenacity. I think you are a

very good voice for the values you champion which sometimes

contain a warning.

There is an old American folk song called "Home on the

Range". Part of the lyrics are:

"...never is heard, a discouraging word..."

I guess some people interpret a "warning" as a

"discouraging". This portion of the song speaks to the pain

some people feel when they face a concept put in scientific

rather than politically correct format.

I wonder what they feel when they see a "speed bump ahead"

traffic warning sign.

I am sure the majority who your input absolutely know your

intent is to be helpful and contribute to a quality world

rather than be discouraging.

Marc S. Nameth

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 4                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: vaccine

From:    William Evans 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 10:49:09 -0800

> And I thought the 1918 flu epedemic was caused primarily by Bad

> vaccine????Most folks who survived the epedemic refused it!.

> 

> Marc wrote:

> >

> > This might be of interest:

> >

> > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/amex/influenza/drjeffrey11.html

> >

> > Marc S. Nameth

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 5                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: test

From:    William Evans 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 11:00:41 -0800

fish are good.....test message....

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 6                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Thinking of Unsubscribing

From:    Michael Strates 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:41:17 +1100 (EST)

With the recent load of junk that's been coming in this mail packet, I'm

seriously going to think about unsubscribing from the list.

The list is about fish, nutrients, and their associated macro-organisims

(worms in grow beds), and microorganisims who reside in our grow beds.

C'mon.. let's get back on topic, please! I really don't like having to

type "skip"

--

NOTE TO ALL: My website has moved to a bigger, better server, see below:

e-mail: mstrates@croftj.net   www: http://www.croftj.net/~mstrates

Get PGP Public Key by Finger. Encrypted Mail is Accepted (no SHA hashes)

Fingerprint: 3D68CFB3C61B3A05 7FC68308A3BC0B86. See my pages for info

about the world famous Rocket Trike and how to make one of your own!

Linux!! The OS of my Choice [Melbourne Linux Group] => www.mlug.org.au

.......................................................................

"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned

skyward, for there you have been, and there you long to return."

- Leonardo da Vinci.

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 7                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Model rocketry---Re: Thinking of Unsubscribing

From:    William Evans 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:30:47 -0800

Were at your beckon call...  come on lets fill his brain up!Lets be

pertinent..

Michael Strates wrote:

> 

> With the recent load of junk that's been coming in this mail packet, I'm

> seriously going to think about unsubscribing

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 8                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Chicken Poop

From:    doelle 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:08:37 +1100

Dick,

Please have a look at the web page http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrdhome.html

This is the Livestock Research for Rural Development webpage, an electronic

journal dealing with bio-integrated systems . R.T.Preston is the main main

you should contact or Lylian Rodriguez. They are working in Vietnam at present.

I am sure Frands Dolberg may also be able to help you, as he worked with the

group. His address <

Good luck. If you have any further question please let me know, as I also

could put you in contact with the Philippines, where they now introduce a

lot of these digesters.

At least they are not as sensitive as Ted Ground in this subject.

Best regards

Horst Doelle

>

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 9                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Chicken Poop

From:    doelle 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:19:49 +1100

Hallo Sue,

Personally I do not have such a system around, as we in Australia build

these things in concrete, but you will find them a lot in Vietnam,

Bangladesh and the Philippines. Please consult the electronic journal:

Livestock Research for Rural Development on

http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrdhome.html

wher4e you will find a great number of articles on this subject ,e.g. Vol.

9,no.2 (1997) by An, Preston and Dolberg: The introduction of low-cost

polyethylene tube biodigesters on small scale farms in Vietnam.

You can also visit http://www.ias.unu.edu/proceedings/icibs

and you will find amongst others an article by Moog and coworkers on:

Promotion and utilisatyion of polyethylene biodigester in smallhold farming

systems in the Philippines'

I hope you find these useful. We certainly find a better ear for our health

warnings in these developing countries who suffer under them than in our own

country.

Best of luck and if you have any further question, please let me know.

Horst

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 10                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Animal waste

From:    doelle 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:27:50 +1100

Collin,

Many thanks for the explanation. I fully agree with you. The use of human

and animal manure was not only used traditionally in Asia on the farms ,

but all over the world. I still remember as a boy in the 1940s, that my

grandfather emptied the septic system into his garden and the farmer in

big lorries onto the field.

This, however was in the days of lower population, of NO chicken or other

animal farming and also in those days we had no antibiotics or hormones

to feed the animals to get a good price on the market.

This situation has changed and so the drastical resistancy and effect on

human lifes.

ARE YOU PREPARED TO TAKE THE RISK THAT YOUR BIOFERTILISATION WITH MANURE

CAUSES AN OUTBREAK OF DISEASE ? That is the question, as farmers are not

able to judge how many pathogens are in the manure.

We have to educate people to stop with that practise because of the risk

involved. That has nothing to do with scaremongering or so. FAO figures

clearly show that the infectious diseases are on the increase again. I am

only talking about bacteria and have not even mentioned viruses in my

discussion.

Best regards

Horst

At 10:12 AM 23/01/99 +0800, you wrote: 

>>>>

List members

As Horst has pointed out, the practise of rearing animals above

ponds where various species are cultured is widespread in Asia.

If a problem exists with this then I believe it is the clash between

traditional farming practises and the modern industrial approach.

In other words it is not the practise per se that's at

fault but rather 

it's possible misuse by individuals.

To explain. When I was observing the raising of carp here in 

Hong Kong in the mid-70's, it was pointed out that the ratio of

ducks to fish (several carp species usually) was common know-

ledge in the villages concerned and this information had been 

handed down for centuries in China. There did not seem to be any 

ill effects or the method would have been discontinued or further 

adapted. However, I have recorded the use of ponds as a sewer/

latrine next to piggeries where over 200 porkers were housed. Even

then the pond ecosystem appeared to be able to cope,

perhaps the 

dilution of the waste by the farmer made it acceptable. This

practise is being fine-tuned at the Asian Institute of Technology in

Bangkok to bring in other animal types. Goats are tethered above

very small ponds holding tilapia to determine the acceptable

carrying capacity. After the World Aquaculture Society's meeting

in 1996 delegates were bussed to the Institute and the loudest

reaction pondside came from those living northwest of Cuba :)

So perhaps it is not the practise that's at fault, but simply the 

manner in which it's implimented and of course the degree.

Pathogens may indeed be present but if the carrying capacity

is reasonable, they may not pose an unacceptable hazard. But

I'm in no way a micro-biologist and so I'll take a quick step to

the rear.

Cheers

Colin

<<<<<<<<

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 11                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Model rocketry---Re: Thinking of Unsubscribing

From:    Michael Strates 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:22:19 +1100 (EST)

On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, William Evans wrote:

WE> Were at your beckon call...  come on lets fill his brain up!Lets be

WE> pertinent..

My signature file was just to alert people about my new URL. I've received

100s of e-mails asking "why doesn't your website work", and hence I needed

a quick way to get it out to everyone.

It's out of my sig now.. Happy? :-)

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 12                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Glowing cash crop

From:    "KevinLReed" 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 17:20:19 -0800

Hi All,

We have just completed our new green house specially made for our transgenic

plants.

Having found a commercial use for glow in the dark plants using firefly

luciferse genes it may be that we will soon become filthy wealthy from this

" crop".

These GE ( no pun intended) plants contain a male sterility construct to

prevent formation of pollen and transmission of their traits to other

plants. Also, after being planted for only three to five days they are

removed and destroyed, then replaced by new plants so they will always look

absolutely perfect as this is important to our customer. I would like to

thank some of the group for pointing out that the evil giant Monsanto has

lots of money. It seems that a substantial part of our new income will be in

the form of sponsorship by this company. They are interested as I am in

showing the public that GE plants are not a hazard to the public welfare if

they are handled in a responsible way. So killing two bird with one stone

and I will get to put more money in the bank while sleeping very well at

night as to how the money is earned.

When you listen to what is being said even an opposing point of view can be

very beneficial. Thanks again.

Kevin

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 13                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Ted  

From:    doelle 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:31:29 +1100

Adriana,

Many thanks for your encouragement. I have received indeed a huge number of

enquiries regarding cheap and efficient digesters. This is encouraging. 

It is still my opinion that people can do whatever they like as long as they

are aware of certain dangers and that they are taking a risk, although this

risk may not always be obvious.

Thanks

Horst

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 14                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Organics Gaining Ground Approval

From:    doelle 

Date:    Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:37:42 +1100

David,

Many thanks for drawing our attention to this article. As I mentioned on a=

 number of occasions, the word =F3rganic' has to be defined. If all manure=

 containing antibiotics and hormones are excluded, the majority of animal=

 and human waste would not be allowed onto the field. This is great and=

 certainly shows the enormous responsibility of USDA. I sincerely hope that=

 the regulation comes through.

On the other hand it is very disappointing to realise that we have to have=

 for everything a law and that one cannot reason with some people in the=

 biofertiliser area.

Horst

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 15                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Animal waste

From:    Colin Johnston 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 22:30:31 +0800

List members

As Horst has pointed out, the practise of rearing animals above

ponds where various species are cultured is widespread in Asia.

If a problem exists with this then I believe it is the clash between

traditional farming practises and the modern industrial approach.

In other words it is not the practise per se that's at fault but rather

it's possible misuse by individuals.

To explain. When I was observing the raising of carp here in

Hong Kong in the mid-70's, it was pointed out that the ratio of

ducks to fish (several carp species usually) was common know-

ledge in the villages concerned and this information had been

handed down for centuries in China. There did not seem to be any

ill effects or the method would have been discontinued or further

adapted. However, I have recorded the use of ponds as a sewer/

latrine next to piggeries where over 200 porkers were housed. Even

then the pond ecosystem appeared to be able to cope, perhaps the

dilution of the waste by the farmer made it acceptable. This

practise is being fine-tuned at the Asian Institute of Technology in

Bangkok to bring in other animal types. Goats are tethered above

very small ponds holding tilapia to determine the acceptable

carrying capacity. After the World Aquaculture Society's meeting

in 1996 delegates were bussed to the Institute and the loudest

reaction pondside came from those living northwest of Cuba :)

So perhaps it is not the practise that's at fault, but simply the

manner in which it's implimented and of course the degree.

Pathogens may indeed be present but if the carrying capacity

is reasonable, they may not pose an unacceptable hazard. But

I'm in no way a micro-biologist and so I'll take a quick step to

the rear.

Cheers

Colin

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 16                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Chicken Poop

From:    Colin Johnston 

Date:    Sun, 24 Jan 1999 22:29:48 +0800

Terry

>I have a brochure I acquired from Auburn University about Tilapia raising in

>Guatemala. They were quite specific in praising the idea of chicken coops 

>directly above the ponds so the excreta would fall through into the water.

>I believe the idea was to create a more friendly environment for the algae

>growth, and hence food for the Tilapia. Is this in fact, not a good idea, what 

>with the pathogens going into the water straight from

>the chickens? I was planning on doing this on my place in Belize.

As I've mentioned elsewhere, I believe that it's a question of getting the

ratio of poultry to aquatic systems right and not overloading the environment. 

AIT in Bangkok has plenty of papers on this aspect of polyculture and you 

may wish to access their homepage on the net to get contacts. Prof. Kwei 

Lin and his staff would, no doubt, be happy to assist. 



Whilst a bit superficial this link examines briefly an expect of polyculture.

Take it from there : 

Cheers

Colin

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 17                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Ted  

From:    Michael Strates 

Date:    Tue, 26 Jan 1999 03:03:02 +1100 (EST)

Horst,

d> Many thanks for your encouragement. I have received indeed a huge

d> number of enquiries regarding cheap and efficient digesters. This is

d> encouraging.

For those interested in experimenting with methane digestion, I can supply

plans for a pop-bottle methane digestor, which will make just enough

methane to make a small flame for a couple of minutes.

I have a trashcan digester which I made myself, and it works very well.

The number one rule with a digester of any sort is (listen carefully):

 DONT LET ANY AIR INTO THE DIGESTION CHAMBER

As a precaution buy a burnback arrestor, and even place a small amount of

glasswool at 6" intervals throughout the pipe. This will slow your flow

down dramatically, but will significantly reduce the chances of

backburning.

d> It is still my opinion that people can do whatever they like as long

d> as they are aware of certain dangers and that they are taking a

d> risk, although this risk may not always be obvious.

Be careful of anerobic bacteria.. alot of them (most of them) are baddies.

Check out my new lite signature file folks:



Back to Index