Aquaponics Digest - Fri 03/12/99




Message   1: Re:Big Fish

             from Dave Miller 

Message   2: Re: RV: Aquaponics in Tree Culture/Restoration.

             from Dave Miller 

Message   3: Re: Other mail lists

             from KLOTTTRUE

Message   4: Re: Other mail lists

             from KLOTTTRUE

Message   5: Re: Specs

             from KLOTTTRUE

Message   6: Re: Other mail lists

             from "Dale Robinson" 

Message   7: Re: three pound lettuce bags

             from "Dale Robinson" 

Message   8: RE: Big Fish

             from Alejandro Gallardo Valencia 

Message   9: Re: Specs

             from "Ted Ground" 

Message  10: Re: Specs

             from Gordon Watkins 

Message  11: Re: PH question

             from Gordon Watkins 

Message  12: Re: PH question

             from "Joe Insana" 

Message  13: Re: three pound lettuce bags

             from Adriana Gutierrez 

Message  14: Re: PH question

             from jilli and lars 

Message  15: Re: Specs

             from jilli and lars 

Message  16: Re: PH question

             from Adriana Gutierrez 

Message  17: Re: Aquaponics in Tree Culture/Restoration.

             from jilli and lars 

Message  18: Re: three pound lettuce bags

             from "Dale Robinson" 

Message  19: Re: PH question

             from "Joe Insana" 

Message  20: Re: Subduing nitrates and nitrites

             from "Ted Ground" 

Message  21: Re: Specs

             from doelle 

Message  22: Re: Specs

             from doelle 

Message  23: Re: Specs

             from doelle 

Message  24: Re: Salvation Utility Vehicles

             from "Paul Anthony" 

Message  25: Re: Specs

             from jilli and lars 

Message  26: antibiotics and iris's

             from jilli and lars 

Message  27: Re: Mr. Pauls Aquaponic Fish Sticks

             from KLOTTTRUE

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 1                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re:Big Fish

From:    Dave Miller 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 01:23:38 -0500

Alejandro,

Muchichimas gracias para tratar a entender mi. Yo no quiero

representarme como loco, solo que yo tengo un interes en ideas

diferentes. Por lo que no como carne ni pescado, (con excepcio'n) yo

deseo que puede entender o respectar las diferencias mias.

Many thanks for trying to understand me. I don't wish to represent

myself as strange, only as one with different ideas and interests. 

Because I rarely eat meat or fish I hope (appreciate) that you can

respect or understand my differences.

Abrigado

--

Dave

_______________________________________

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

A "green" home remodeler

A father of 2 cockatiels

An organic farmer

A veggie drummer/keyboardist

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 2                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: RV: Aquaponics in Tree Culture/Restoration.

From:    Dave Miller 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 01:28:28 -0500

I really enjoyed learning how beach cactus plums and poison ivy actually

hold the duns together

--

Dave

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 3                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Other mail lists

From:    KLOTTTRUE

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 04:28:23 EST

In a message dated 3/11/99 11:32:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,

bgracia@rtripp.com writes:

<< Some time ago, someone posted an address for a mail list on worms.  Does

 anyone know the address?

 

 Brian >>

http:www.wormman.com/redworms.htm  Heres one Brian. Ken

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 4                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Other mail lists

From:    KLOTTTRUE

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 04:28:49 EST

In a message dated 3/11/99 11:32:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,

bgracia@rtripp.com writes:

<< Some time ago, someone posted an address for a mail list on worms.  Does

 anyone know the address?

 

 Brian >>

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 5                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    KLOTTTRUE

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 06:21:27 EST

Gentlemen,I hate to be one,but isn't this what Lars was trying to say the

other day,when he was talking about bacteria exchanging information,or

material,when you rebuffed him Horst,and Ted I think when Lars made the

comparision of the Mega corporations to the Nazi's,he might have been

referring to things,like this Transgenic fish,wasn't Hitler trying to build a

Superhuman race thru Genetic engineering. I don't have the education,that any

of you have,I can't read the label on a bag of feed,and discern what should be

there and what should not,how will I know if the fingerlings I purchase,have

been Genetically altered,or are resistant to antibiotics. I know from just

observing life,that crowding,creates an enviroment for sickness to

multiply,for instance daycare centers,big cities,refugee camps,just to name a

few,I know fish school in the wild,but I didn't know nature produces natural

antibiotics,until I read this conversation between Ted and Horst,could Lars be

right when he suggests growing plants,and setting up an ecosystem to match the

fish? Do the plants produce something that the keeps the fish healthy? I don't

believe there is anyone out there who can do it better than nature,but you

people have a much better chance than I do. The other day I expressed that my

concern for using natural foods was for taste and economics. But since reading

this posting on superbugs and hormones,I must include safety.Should I have my

own brood stock? I don't want to be responsible for making anyone sick. If you

people will get together and come up with a recipe for a safe fish food,and

send it to me,there are several feed mills around here,Large ones and small

ones,there is even one in my Brother in laws family,I will go to all of them

and see if they can make it for us. And if you can come up with some kind of a

ball park figure on the amount of feed to run it would be good, ( CO-OP )

Maybe,money talks.  Ken

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 6                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Other mail lists

From:    "Dale Robinson" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 09:06:34 -0600

Worm Forum  

>Some time ago, someone posted an address for a mail list on worms.  Does

>anyone know the address?

>

>Brian

Best regards

Dale Robinson

prof-robinson@worldnet.att.net



.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 7                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: three pound lettuce bags

From:    "Dale Robinson" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 09:18:46 -0600

Sounds like a good idea.  Keep in mind that it needs to be accessable enough

to get a bag on it easily.  The bottom of the bowl needs to be able to hold

onto a bag too.  Perhaps another smaller bowl(one the bag will fit around)

with the bottom removed and attached bottom to bottom to the big bowl would

work.

Best regards

Dale Robinson

prof-robinson@worldnet.att.net



.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 8                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: RE: Big Fish

From:    Alejandro Gallardo Valencia 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:03:05 -0600

Dave:

        It's great that you chose to avoid meat.  Personally I'm very =

carnivorous, but I consider a well balanced vegetarian meal quite =

desirable.  It's just that I've encoutered some people that become real =

fanatics to the point of taking vegetarism to almost religious extremes =

(the kind that try to get everybody to become vegetarians).  That gets =

me a little deffensive.  Above all, you don't sound "loco", you sound =

convinced on a principle.  Thats good.

Best regards.

Alejandro

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 9                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    "Ted Ground" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:15:21 -0600

>chromosome or into a plasmid"  but this is just basic modern microbiology.

> You are correct and interpret the article ok. However, if there were no

resistant >bacteria, this would not occur. 

I think it is important to note that the mechanisms of genetic transfer

listed by Levy exists for any given bacterial gene, whether or not

antibiotic resistance is that gene.  These mechanisms have occurred in

Nature for eons.  Humanity did not create these mechanisms of inter and

intra genera and species genetic transfer.  By the same token, the

mechanisms could act in nature in the opposite way, that is the gene for

antibiotic resistance can be replaced with yet another normal gene which

allows the bacterial cell wall to be acted upon by the antibiotic, thus

transforming the bacterium back into one which is no longer antibiotic

resistant. 

> 

> This is well known to us microbiologists. If you transfer a gene and ask

the bug to >do more work, but keep the energy metabolism the same, one asks

for more work >for the same amount of energy available. Thus growth will

suffer and this is the >reason for failing in the competition for survivval

of the fittest. Darwin's Law.

That could well be in this case....that certainly could have played a

factor in it's being outcompeted...however, it seems also probable that the

shear numbers and the overall environmental fitness of the native bacterium

combined to outcompete the introduced engineered species

 

> >On the other hand, we read in The Ecology of Soil Bacteria, an old book

I

> >have dusted off just recently, that inter-generic transformation between

> >Rhizobium and Agrobacterium (2 different genera, not just 2 different

> >species) was reported way back in 1953, before they were tampering

> >artificial DNA recombinations...so the implication is that certain

traits

> >(genetic material) can cross genus boundaries in Nature...

> 

> Of course, Ted. That is what evolution is all about, but it takes a long

time and does not effect necessarily our food.

Well, the study period of the paper I referred to did not span geological

eras.  Two different genera were introduced in test plots, grown, and

isolated after being exposed to one another. The result was that genetic

traits had been transferred...I will have to get a reprint of that paper to

check it out in more detail.

 

> Sure, we can learn a lot of nature, but unfortunately many think they can

do better >than nature. We can improve and speed up the process, but this

would not require >genetic transfer.

> 

I think the point was that genetic transfer across genera lines can take

place in Nature without any effort on our part.  An interesting question is

how frequently this occurs, and then, after it occurs, what selection

pressures and competition factors are present or persistant enough to

result in the further propagation of that particular gene's presence in its

newest "host" organism. 

> 

> Ted, this is exactly the reason why bacteria get resistant. They adapt in

nature to >antibiotics. But antibiotic production in nature does not occur

on a regular basis, as >it is a 'secondary' product. One has to manipulate

the medium of bacterial growth in >order to get good antibiotic production.

You will never find an overproduction of >antibiotics in soil and thus will

rarely find natural antibiotic resistancy in soil >bacteria. This is often

used as an excuse rather than a fact.

> 

I did not say that fungi in natural soils "overproduce" antibiotics.  I

disagree that antibiotics production in nature does not occur on a regular

basis...I think we are discussing the importance of different amounts,

rather than the fact of it's occurance in nature...I dont think you can

prove to me that in an acre of topsoil, that some of the fungal species are

not producing some kind of antibiotic at some point in their growth and

decay cycle...Especially since it is reasonable to assume that there are

antibiotics out there that we have yet to discover..so how could you know

that they aren't being produced on a regular basis if we dont know what

they are yet? 

> This has also been scientifically proven. Ever heard about the mad cow

disease ?? >and its effect on humans ??

Yes, I know about reports of Spongiform Encephalitis and the proposed

mechanism of "infection" by prions- non living proteins that somehow induce

cells to produce more copies of that kind of prion.....The prions serve no

useful function for the cell, but clutter up things rather badly.... I have

heard reports that there is nothing in the known universe can denature

these proteins- heat, composting, ultraviolet light, microwaves, crystal

power, etc., and so they will persist like that robot in the Terminator

movies...I strongly doubt those kinds of claims, and I suspect they are

propagated by the vegetarian and animal rights activists....At the same

time I am very interested in learning more about S.E. and the biochemistry

of these prions and I know enough about it to be concerned about it.  This

mad cow thing is an interesting topic, but I think it departs somewhat from

the main gist of what we are talking about here...

 

> Anyhow Ted, as you said before, caution is the mother of all things. I

simply >believe that people can make as much money as they like, but please

not on cost >of health.

Horst, you knave! Don't plant your quotes in my mouth! 

I would never say anything of the sort, (I got a big chuckle out of that

one).  

As we know, it is not caution but risk that is the mother of all life.

Without risk, there would be no mothers.  Or, put in another way Risk is a

Mother!

Cheers,

Ted.

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 10                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    Gordon Watkins 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:17:22 -0600

The easiest way to avoid unwanted feed additives (in the US at least) is to

read the label. While it is possible to purchase medicated feed at the local

feed store, particularly for chickens, pigs, and cows, it is prominently

labeled as such and costs quite a bit more.

    The real problem is not with these local feed sources but with the big

multi-national, vertically integrated "family farms" like Tysons and Cargill

(ADM?) who supply their growers with a proprietary feed, the ingredients being

a closely guarded secret. I have had lab analysis done on Tysons poultry litter

and found it to have toxic levels of copper, cadmium and arsenic, all

deliberate feed additives and all heavy metals which accumulate in the soil.

These were just the elements I specifically tested for. I didn't check for

antibiotics or other meds, which I assumed to be present, because they

bio-degrade rather quickly in the soil and are not as troublesome as the

metals. Who knows (including the FDA) what else could be found if one had the

resources to check?

                                Gordon

Ted Ground wrote:

>  In the US, antibiotic additives are not allowed in fish feed manufacturing.

>  That is, they are NOT ALLOWED as a prophylatic (disease preventative

> agent) in fish feeds for aquacultured animals grown for human consumption.

> Only 2 antibiotics are allowed in aquaculture (by the US Food and Drug

> Administration) that I know of, and then only for therapeutic purposes

> (once disease has already broken out in the aquaculture system and  the

> treatment is to be short term and limited)- those are Terramyacin

> (oxytetracycline) and Romet.  The aquaculture operations that I am aware

> of- especially fish hatcheries where the fish are not going immediately to

> human consumption, but will be stocked into waters as fingerlings- isolate

> the diseased animals - usually these are the big, very valuable brood stock

> animals in the hatchery, that are in limited numbers compared to the

> millions of fish fry or fingerlings- These treated animals are isolated

> from the unaffected animals and the antibiotics are introduced either by

> injection or by a temporary isolated water bath treatment with the

> antibiotic in suspension or in solution, rather than incorporating it into

> the feed...If anyone has more insight into that please let me know, since

> the FDA is slow on many things, but nevertheless they can make changes in

> restrictions and regulations at a whim...so, this is to the best of my

> knowledge.

>

> I could be mistaken, but the only antibiotic additive in animal feeds in

> the US that I know of is in some formulations of chicken feed, and that

> would be erythromyacin...Anyone more familiar with that please let us

> know.... I really don't know what is done with dairy or cattle feeds, but

> to the best of my knowledge, antibiotic additives to feeds for the purpose

> of prophylatic intentions (continuous antibiotic treatment whether the

> animal has a disease or not) are not the rule but the exception with

> respect to animal feed formulations in agriculture

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 11                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: PH question

From:    Gordon Watkins 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:30:30 -0600

Joe,

    Describe your system a little more: what is the source and pH of your

makeup water? What kind of media are you using for plant production? How

long has your system been in operation? Do you see any symptoms of nutrient

deficiencies/toxicities in your plants (chlorosis, etc)? What plants and

fish are you growing?

    pH regulation, particularly lowering, with chemicals is tricky business

and is notoriously unstable and requires careful monitoring and fine tuning.

Others correct me if I'm wrong, but as aquaponic systems age they become

more acidic due to accumulation of organic matter and production of humic

acids. If your rooting media is some sort of reactive rock, like limestone,

that could be part of your problem, necessitating replacement with more

inert media. If your system is relatively new, your fish are growing well

with low mortality, and your plants grow well and show no symtoms of

distress, I would leave it alone and monitor it for awhile before taking any

drastic measures.

                                Gordon

Joe Insana wrote:

> I have a small aquaponics system set up and my PH is at 8.2 which I

> understand is not good for the plants but at this point my little

> fishies seem to love it.  How do I lower the PH (what product) and where

> do I buy it from? Thanks

>

> Joe Insana

> New London, OH

> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 12                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: PH question

From:    "Joe Insana" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:14:23 EST

Gordon,

Thank you for responding,

>Describe your system a little more: what is the source and pH of your 

make-up water? 

   My system is an NFT set-up like a flood and drain system with 4" pipe 

and a 50 gallon fish tank. This set-up is for home schooling and for my 

pleasure as well. My make-up water is from a small RO system and the PH 

is around 6.

>What kind of media are you using for plant production?

  Leca-ton rock, an item I purchased from Crop King and rockwool starter 

cubes in cups. I did rinse and boil the rocks before use.

>How long has your system been in operation? 

I started it about 40 days ago with city water and have used RO for 

make-up since.

>Do you see any symptoms of nutrient deficiencies/toxicities in your 

plants (chlorosis, etc)? 

As I am fairly new at this what deficiencies I am learning as I go along 

but what I see are a few of my plants have thin bases.

>What plants and fish are you growing?

The plants are a mix of Lettuces, broccoli,sweet peas and cauliflower.

The fish I just received 3 days ago are Nilotica Tilapia from Living 

Waters.

>If your system is relatively new, your fish are growing well with low 

mortality, and your plants grow well and show no symptoms of distress, I 

would leave it alone and monitor it for awhile before taking any drastic 

measures.

Yes the system is new and I will wait to see how things work out before 

I do anything. 

**But if it comes down to having to lower my pH or raising it what do I 

use? As I understand it the products for Hydroponics are not to be used 

in Aquaculture and vice versa.

Thanks 

 Joe Insana

 New London, OH

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 13                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: three pound lettuce bags

From:    Adriana Gutierrez 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:02:29 -0500

Dale,

It sounds like a plastic trash can with the bottom cut out would

make a good chute.  The bag would fit over the neck of the can

which would hold it in place until it is full

Dale Robinson wrote:

> 

> Sounds like a good idea.  Keep in mind that it needs to be accessable enough

> to get a bag on it easily.  The bottom of the bowl needs to be able to hold

> onto a bag too.  Perhaps another smaller bowl(one the bag will fit around)

> with the bottom removed and attached bottom to bottom to the big bowl would

> work.

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 14                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: PH question

From:    jilli and lars 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:21:32 -0800

hi joe -

 What is your hydroponic substrate? Do you have any substrate in the tanks?

I don't think you should be looking for a 'product' to lower your pH, you

should try to set up your system so it self-regulates as much as possible.

Additives merely correct the problem temporarily and make your system

'dependent' on that additive.

lars fields

Joe Insana wrote:

> I have a small aquaponics system set up and my PH is at 8.2 which I

> understand is not good for the plants but at this point my little

> fishies seem to love it.  How do I lower the PH (what product) and where

> do I buy it from? Thanks

>

> Joe Insana

> New London, OH

> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 15                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    jilli and lars 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:58:21 -0800

thanks ken -

KLOTTTRUE wrote:

> Gentlemen,I hate to be one,but isn't this what Lars was trying to say the

> other day,when he was talking about bacteria exchanging information,or

> material,when you rebuffed him Horst,and Ted I think when Lars made the

> comparision of the Mega corporations to the Nazi's,he might have been

> referring to things,like this Transgenic fish,wasn't Hitler trying to build a

> Superhuman race thru Genetic engineering. I don't have the education,that any

> of you have,I can't read the label on a bag of feed,and discern what should be

> there and what should not,how will I know if the fingerlings I purchase,have

> been Genetically altered,or are resistant to antibiotics. I know from just

> observing life,that crowding,creates an enviroment for sickness to

> multiply,for instance daycare centers,big cities,refugee camps,just to name a

> few,I know fish school in the wild,but I didn't know nature produces natural

> antibiotics,until I read this conversation between Ted and Horst,could Lars be

> right when he suggests growing plants,and setting up an ecosystem to match the

> fish? Do the plants produce something that the keeps the fish healthy?

    I have heard, though from somewhat anecdotal sources, that an iris

variety (and possibly the iris family) produces antibiotics. I've had iris's

growing in my system from the start, mainly because they are perfect for a

marsh-type environment - they like wet feet  ie., don't mind constantly

submerged

roots. They probably transfer oxygen to their root zones, as well.     I've even

had one large rhizome floating on the water surface, growing like it's very own

raft system, without the raft (the rhizome floats and the roots grow

downwards). I

know this isn't exactly the kind of conditions they are adapted to, but it's

been

working well so far....

anybody out their with more knowledge of plant chemistry who can confirm whether

iris's produce antibiotics and what affect (positive or negative) that might

have

on an aquaponic system.

lars fields

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 16                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: PH question

From:    Adriana Gutierrez 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:10:19 -0500

Joe,

I believe that Paula mentioned that the "experts" told her that

the PH in her system was WAY to high but, guess what?  THe plants

and the fish both thrived despite all of their dire predictions. 

Aquaponic systems are different than regular hydroponics in that

respect.

Adriana

> > I have a small aquaponics system set up and my PH is at 8.2 which I

> > understand is not good for the plants but at this point my little

> > fishies seem to love it.  How do I lower the PH (what product) and where

> > do I buy it from? Thanks

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 17                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Aquaponics in Tree Culture/Restoration.

From:    jilli and lars 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:06:57 -0800

hi darren and kaycy,

        I thank you for reigning in my exaggerations with your real world

experience.

        I suppose you are right about the lack of profits in the tropical fish

market. Especially if your market is experienced in terms of fish care and

has few

die-offs. The more experienced your customer - the more likely _they_ will

have a

successful breeding and potentially become your competitor! But I suppose it

might

at least help pay for the hobby.

        However, i disagree with your opinions in one area - the finicky-ness of

many tropical species. Most of the fish that are readily available in pet

stores or

from breeders are fish species that have already proved easily adaptable to

traditional aquarium practices - ie. the use of tap water combined with

expensive

and overly complicated filtering mechanisms, not to mention the

ion-exchangers, CO2

injectors, and reverse-osmosis devices that are so heavily pushed by nearly

every

freshwater aquarium book, website, and petstore salesperson on the planet.

So the

fish that are most commonly available are those that like (or can at least

tolerate)

these limited conditions. Fish that require conditions outside of those that are

easy to maintain using this equipment are less likely to survive and, therefore,

aren't commonly available within the tropical fish market. Nor are they as

likely to

make it into the manuals of pet fish care, etc. So the buyer of fish is less

likely

to try maintaining this species, so there is not market and we have a cycle....

        The chocalate gourami might be a good example. This fish requires

peat-filtered, very soft water with a pH range or 4.5-6. These water conditions

might be easier (and cheaper) to maintain with a modified aquaponic system

rather

than the traditional aquarium setup. But because most aquarists don't use

aquaponics

or know the meaning of 'biotope', the chocolate gourami is not as popular as

other

fish. If aquarists knew about and used aquaponic techniques, the market for that

fish would probably widen, as more people would know how to care for it, and

more

chocolate gourami's would be bred in captivity, etc. That is one example, but I

imagine that there are probably lots more species that we just don't see at all.

        Another related example is the clown loach. Clown loaches are commonly

available and will survive quite well (though not healthily or happily) in your

standard 'community tank' aquarium conditions. However, clown loaches rarely

breed

in captivity, so the clown loaches you see in pet stores are almost

definitely wild

caught. Additionally, they are rarely kept in conditions which they feel

comfortable

in - they like dark water and a very soft substrate. Almost every specimen I

see is

in poor health. Quite recently, several people have started to figure out

the types

of conditions they require to breed. Captive breeding would cut down on the

number

of wild-caught specimens. Creating the envionment for breeding clown loaches

might

not be easier with aquaponical techniques - i'm not sure, at least. But I

suspect it

might. It would be nice to cut down on the number of wild-caught clown

loaches that

come all the way from Borneo just to die a slow death in some pink-and-blue

gravelled tank with plastic plants.

       I'm only guessing here, but I also imagine that a fish with very specific

water requirements would also be one that would be most threatened by

alterations in

their environment due to human encroachment, and therefore one that would be in

danger of extinction.

        I've found my small aquaponic aquarium to be much more stable than

aquariums

i've 'run' in the past. It's also been cheaper to set up. And in the process or

running it, i've learned a lot more about water chemistry and aquatic life

dynamics.

The traditional aquarium practices just don't make living systems as

'transparent'

or obvious as aquaponic techniques do, which makes it more difficult for

traditional

aquiarium keeping to be an educational activity.  My system also 'creates' a

lot of

life food for the fish, which cuts down on operational costs and improves

the health

and diet of my captives, besides giving them something to do.

        I'm really only a beginner with this, though. In the very least,

aquaponics

seems to be an much easier and cheaper way of maintining good water quality.

In my

limited experience, I would think that hydroponic filtering of aquarium

water has

cut down (or maybe can even eliminate, in a properly designed system) my

need for

the weekly water changes. Nitrate buildup is also no longer a problem.

        I what ways do you think aquaponics might benefit the tropical aquarium?

lars fields

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 18                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: three pound lettuce bags

From:    "Dale Robinson" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:37:53 -0600

You can try that.  A thing to remember though is that you want to make it so

you can slip the bag onto the chute with one hand, otherwise you spend more

time fiddling with the bags then filling them.   strecting the bags will

make the bag look a little weird too. If you could find a  plastic canister

or trash can that the bag will fit loosely around that will probibly work

best for you.  You could cut the bottom on an angle so you have a little bit

of a point to start the bags onto the chute.  The nice thing about having

the bag fit on the outside of the chute is that you can weigh it as it is

filling.

Best regards

Dale Robinson

Andriana wrote

>It sounds like a plastic trash can with the bottom cut out would

>make a good chute.  The bag would fit over the neck of the can

>which would hold it in place until it is full

>

>Dale Robinson wrote:

>>

>> Sounds like a good idea.  Keep in mind that it needs to be accessable

enough

>> to get a bag on it easily.  The bottom of the bowl needs to be able to

hold

>> onto a bag too.  Perhaps another smaller bowl(one the bag will fit

around)

>> with the bottom removed and attached bottom to bottom to the big bowl

would

>> work.

>

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 19                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: PH question

From:    "Joe Insana" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:09:15 EST

Thank you Gordon, Lars and Adriana for your responses.

>From what you are saying I am going to leave my system alone and allow 

it to mature and let nature take its course so to speak.  

Thanks again.

Joe Insana

New London, OH

a place where the clouds have been ruling the skies all winter.

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 20                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Subduing nitrates and nitrites

From:    "Ted Ground" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:20:52 -0600

Andrew and/or Brian,

What can you tell us about this technology of subduing nitrates and

nitrites.

It has been a while, and the thread seems to been left off..I would like to

hear more from you fellows on this.

Ted.

----------

> From: Andrew 

> To: 'aquaponics@townsqr.com'

> Subject: RE: Subduing nitrates and nitrites

> Date: Sunday, February 28, 1999 6:13 AM

> 

> We use this technology successfully.

> 

> Feed conversions are app. 2lb of feed per ft squared.

> 

> Set up right this system becomes self cleaning.

> 

> Currently an aquaponics site uses our system for growing 

> 20,000 Barramundi Lates calcarifer and 30,000 head of lettuce.

> 

> They also use the N.F.T. troughs for their veggie production.

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Brian Gracia [SMTP:bgracia@rtripp.com]

> Sent: Monday, 1 March 1999 8:28

> To:   aquaponics@townsqr.com

> Subject:      Subduing nitrates and nitrites

> 

> I have yet another question.  I went on a net safari to find the ever

> elusive "information" about amonia, nitrates and nitrites.  One of the

> links I came across involved using 50ft of 1/4" tubing to raise bacteria

to

> change amonia to nitrates and nitrites and nitrogen gas.  Has anyone done

> this for their tank systems?  I know that S&S uses grow beds and this

works

> for them, but I will be using troughs to grow veggies in.

> 

> Brian

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 21                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    doelle 

Date:    Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:04:27 +1000

Ken,

Please do not get upset and scared of what we are discussing. We only

discuss what can happen when we try to believe that nature is not doing its

job. In reality nature cannot do its job properly because we are interfering.

<other day,when he was talking about bacteria exchanging information,or

>material,when you rebuffed him Horst,

I thought that lars was trying to justify genetical engineering because

genetical exchange occurs in nature. However, I realised in his response

that I misunderstood his argument. Bacteria can only exchenge genetical

material amongst there own species or in a very restricted bacterial

community. Since there are very few antibiotics formed in nature, there is

no reason to believe that bacteria become quickly resistant to all antibiotics.

and Ted I think when Lars made the

>comparision of the Mega corporations to the Nazi's,he might have been

>referring to things,like this Transgenic fish,wasn't Hitler trying to build a

>Superhuman race thru Genetic engineering.

In the days of Hitler, we did not even know anything about genetical

engineering and thus he could not have thought that way. He however

promogated a superrace through breeding so-called arians,a name I believe

comes from India, but I could be wrong.

I don't have the education,that any

>of you have,I can't read the label on a bag of feed,and discern what should be

>there and what should not,how will I know if the fingerlings I purchase,have

>been Genetically altered,or are resistant to antibiotics. 

> Do the plants produce something that the keeps the fish healthy? I don't

>believe there is anyone out there who can do it better than nature,

I do not believe that we can do better than nature, who keeps everything in

perfect balance. However, we can help nature to improve instead of

destroying and make so-called super-fish or super-crop etc.

The whole issue has come to the peak only because there is money in the

manufacture of genetical engineered goods.

I only attack genetical engineering in the food industry and not in medical

science, because in the latter case, we do not eat the microbe. 

Ken, government do start to setup safety measures for those companies. My

argument is, however, they I as an individual should be able to make a

choice whether I like a beautiful large red looking genetically engineered

tomato or whether I prefer the much more tasty natural tomato. The same goes

with every food including fish.

If we stick together and pressurise the authorities on that issue, the

future may be ok.

Thus, do not be scared for the presence, but we are lookiing for the future

and the future generation.

OK ?

Best regards Horst

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 22                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    doelle 

Date:    Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:15:38 +1000

Ted, I enjoyed your reply.

Best regards Horst

Horst W.Doelle, D.Sc., D.Sc. [h.c.]

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 23                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    doelle 

Date:    Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:18:13 +1000

Gordon, I cannot agree more with your statement. Labeling unfortunately only

occurs where the government forces the issue.

Best regards Horst

Chairman, IOBB

Director, MIRCEN-Biotechnology

FAX: +617-38783230

Email: doelle@ozemail.com.au

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 24                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Salvation Utility Vehicles

From:    "Paul Anthony" 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:21:20 -0600

No one seems to have addressed the issue of transgenic tilapia with

potential for four-fold increase in growth rates. What will this do to

market prices? Aside from the issues of potential and unexplored harmful

effects to the consumer. it would seem to me, markets would be turned upside

down, as extreme rapid growth would result from feeding far less food in a

given time period. Anyone dealing in tilapia at any level for profit would

be forced into using the "designer" fish in order to stay in business at a

competitive price. Does the small scale grower have a recourse in this

scenario or does "big greed" always have to win. I feel confident the sale

of designer fish will be approved in this country and wonder if any research

at the gov't level is going on to protect the consumer.

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 25                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Specs

From:    jilli and lars 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:33:36 -0800

doelle wrote:

> I thought that lars was trying to justify genetical engineering because

genetical exchange occurs in nature. However, I realised in his response

that I misunderstood his argument. Bacteria can only exchenge genetical

material amongst there own species or in a very restricted bacterial

community. Since there are very few antibiotics formed in nature, there is

no reason to believe that bacteria become quickly resistant to all antibiotics.

Yes Horst, if anything, what I was originally trying to suggest was that

people _DO_NOT_NEED_to_buy_ genetically engineered strains of bacteria to

add to greywater systems, because the bacteria might be working out how to

adapt to a particular system  for themselves _already_.  It is redundant.

Instead, by continually adding bacteria samples from various _wild_ sources

(or even damaged ecosystems, as John Todd has pointed out with his

Living Machines), you are constantly exposing 'your' bacteria population to

diverse strains (and genes) from the larger world, thereby increasing the

chance that 'your' bacteria strain(s) will become better and better adapted

to your system's particularities. The system will work it out for itself

because the bacteria (or plasmids) that really 'like' your system will

survive and flourish. The reality is probably a lot more complicated than

that, involving complex inter-special relationships between different

bacterial communities and such, but that's the gist of what I was trying to say.

lars fields

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 26                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: antibiotics and iris's

From:    jilli and lars 

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 15:14:44 -0800

>

>

>     I have heard, though from somewhat anecdotal sources, that an iris

> variety (and possibly the iris family) produces antibiotics. I've had iris's

> growing in my system from the start, mainly because they are perfect for a

> marsh-type environment - they like wet feet  ie., don't mind constantly

submerged

> roots. They probably transfer oxygen to their root zones, as well.

I've even

> had one large rhizome floating on the water surface, growing like it's

very own

> raft system, without the raft (the rhizome floats and the roots grow

downwards). I

> know this isn't exactly the kind of conditions they are adapted to, but

it's been

> working well so far....

>

> anybody out their with more knowledge of plant chemistry who can confirm

whether

> iris's produce antibiotics and what affect (positive or negative) that

might have

> on an aquaponic system.

>

> lars fields

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 27                                                          |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Mr. Pauls Aquaponic Fish Sticks

From:    KLOTTTRUE

Date:    Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:39:20 EST

In a message dated 3/12/99 6:27:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,

justbooks@sofnet.com writes:

<<  No one seems to have addressed the issue of transgenic tilapia with

 potential for four-fold increase in growth rates. What will this do to

 market prices? Aside from the issues of potential and unexplored harmful

 effects to the consumer. it would seem to me, markets would be turned upside

 down, as extreme rapid growth would result from feeding far less food in a

 given time period. Anyone dealing in tilapia at any level for profit would

 be forced into using the "designer" fish in order to stay in business at a

 competitive price. Does the small scale grower have a recourse in this

 scenario or does "big greed" always have to win. I feel confident the sale

 of designer fish will be approved in this country and wonder if any research

 at the gov't level is going on to protect the consumer.

 >>

Hi Paul, The market always suffers,when it is flooded with product,however the

issues of potential and harmful effects to the consumer cannot be proven if

they are unexplored,and unfortunately it is usually too late for someone,when

the effects are discovered. But if people like Ted,Horst,Gordon And others can

make their concerns known to the public,this could be a plus for

aquaponics,people are more health conscious than ever, it is going to take

some marketing strategy,everybody's seen,The other white meat commercials,The

beef,Got Milk, are there any associations promoting Aquaponics?if not there

might need to be.If it's worked right,it could help us,and shoot the hormone

pushers in the foot.The public knows a lot about what is going on in the food

industry,and they're concerned but in order for them to get good and safe

food, they have to know where to go to get it. They need to be educated, I've

had several people a day come up to me and ask what I'm doing,when I respond

that I'm setting up an aquaponic greenhouse,only about one out of ten has ever

heard about it.If you sell a better product people will pay a higher price, as

a matter of fact a lot of people think if it's priced higher,then it must be

better. You can't win if you don't fight. I wouldn't wait on uncle sam to do

anything, they're still trying to catch up. Hang in  there Paul  the world

needs you.   Thanks Ken

S&S Aqua Farm, 8386 County Road 8820, West Plains, MO 65775  417-256-5124

Web page  http://www.townsqr.com/snsaqua/



Back to Index