Aquaponics Digest - Tue 09/21/99




Message   1: 

             from 

Message   2: Re: organic certification Hawaii aquaponics and permaculture

             from Gordon Watkins 

Message   3: Tilapia Levity

             from "TGTX" 

Message   4: Re: Re: tilapia origin

             from "Barry Thomas" 

Message   5: Re: Tilapia Levity

             from "Barry Thomas" 

Message   6: Re: Tilapia Levity

             from Marc & Marcy 

Message   7: Re: Tilapia Levity

             from "James Bell" 

Message   8: Re: Tilapia Levity

             from "TGTX" 

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 1                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: 

From:    

Date:    Tue, 21 Sep 1999 14:19:15 + 5 EST

Any theories on why when I feed floating pellets to my tilapia the resulting

feces tends to sink and 

the fact that when I feed sinking pellets to them, the feces tends to float?

Just wondering if anyone 

had a clue as to why this happens>???????

Mike

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 2                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: organic certification Hawaii aquaponics and permaculture

From:    Gordon Watkins 

Date:    Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:42:36 -0500

Kevin,

    Regarding the cost/benefits of certification, it all depends on your

marketing plans. Certification is nothing more than a marketing tool. If

you plan to sell direct to your cutomers, I doubt if the effort and

costs of certification could be justified. Besides, the relationship you

develop with your customers allows you to educate them about your

production practices, even invite them to participate, which is much

more convincing and meaningful than a certificate.

    Certification becomes more important (and soon to be legally

required in the US) when you distance yourself from the consumer by

selling to a broker, distributor, wholesaler, or retailer. Then

certification creates an audit trail and is a way to assure that the

organic integrity of your product is not compromised after it leaves

your hands, by a trucker fumigating his load for example. Certification

assures the consumer that your product was handled properly at every

stage from your farm to their grocery basket.

    Our farm has been certified since 1980 and currently costs me about

$500 a year plus the headache of paperwork. I sell fruits and vegetables

across the country and certification is required by ALL of our buyers,

without exception, so I have no choice if  I want to sell into those

markets. I also sell locally at farmers markets, PYO, our roadside

stand, and via subscriptions. Certification may add a little credibility

to our local marketing, but our customers who care about organic

production ask pertinent questions and visit our farm, so certification

is irrelevant to them. Unfortunately, I can only sell about 10-15% of my

products locally because I live in a low income, low population area, so

I must ship the bulk of my product, therefore certification is a

necesary evil for me. Like I said, it all depends on your marketing

plan.

                                          Gordon Watkins

KevinLReed wrote:

>   Back to the question about organic farming ... remember? ... I

> wanted to know what the group thinks about organic certification. Is

> it worth the time and money to certify as organic? I am interested in

> you thoughts.Kevin --

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 3                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Tilapia Levity

From:    "TGTX" 

Date:    Tue, 21 Sep 1999 18:51:36 -0500

> Any theories on why when I feed floating pellets to my tilapia the

resulting feces tends to sink and

> the fact that when I feed sinking pellets to them, the feces tends to

float?  Just wondering if anyone

> had a clue as to why this happens>???????

> Mike

Tilapia in the Middle East are known as St. Peters fish, as it is native to

the Jordan River and the Sea of Galilee and, it is thought to be the fish

that St. Peter fished for.

Both Jesus and St. Peter (with Jesus's help) walked on the water in the Sea

of Galilee.

Based on your Tilapia feed observations and the aforementioned feats of

levitation and antigravity, it may be that Tilapia are designed by the

Creator to act as biochemical-electromagnetic-gravitational lenses.

Or not.

Next time you are playing with a laser beam, try passing one by a live

Tilapia.  If the deflection of the beam is greater than that predicted by

Albert Einstein for light beams traversing a local space time curvature due

to mass, then we have confirmation...of something.

Or not.

Tedzo.( * )

One who walks with two feets of levity, and a head full of gravity.

(So I guess that means I float upside down, unless accompanied by Tilapia).

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 4                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Re: tilapia origin

From:    "Barry Thomas" 

Date:    Wed, 22 Sep 1999 01:02:33 +0100

> There's just as much waste from capture fisheries.

Bearing in mind the damage that has been and still is done by capture

fishing, this isn't the most reassuring of statements.  ;)

Seriously, I believe aquaponics to be far better. Most of the waste

produced comes only from the fish you actually want, leaving other

species and their habitat relatively unmolested. This must become less

true though if people go around dumping thousands of tons of carcasses

in holes in the ground.

>  You can extract protein

> and oil from fish offal. In aquaponics there doesn't have to be any

waste. A

> portion of the dissolved waste nutrients goes to hydroponic plants.

The

> remainder along with solid waste (sludge) can be applied to land and

> recycled.  The fish carcasses can be composted and recycled.  This is

an

> ideal.

I agree with all you say. The kind of system Marc described in this

thread seems to cover most of these and shows that we can go some good

way towards ideal already. Just wondered how much of it actually goes

on. It seems to be mainly small to medium sized outfits which actually

attempt to do something meaningful with their "waste". Is this wrong?

>  However, often commercial operations cannot afford ideals.  They

> must obey the laws of economics, the great leveler.  Recycling of

byproducts

> other than dissloved nutrients may not be economical.

There are greater levellers. Physics is one of them and, observing its

laws, it is difficult to see any system which throws away nearly two

thirds of the energy it has managed to store (as fish)  from the various

sources applied to it over the previous nine(?) months as particularly

efficient or sustainable. When the stuff you throw away also degrades

other resources...

So, IMO a system like this (though sound by the laws of economics)

actually contributes nothing - it is a parasite.

This, of course, refers to bad systems whose intentions have nothing to

do with food production and a well designed aquaponic setup with decent

recycling is a different thing.

>  The nutrient waste

> from hydroponics can also be recycled, so no difference there.  What

is an

> advantage, despite the obvious ones that have been discussed

repeatedly, is

> that you are raising high quality protein.  You've jumped a few

counters

> over in the supermarket from the salad section.

You've also jumped a few steps away from the sun. In addition, it seems

that you must put quite a lot of protein into the fish before you have a

chance of getting any back? Does the quality of the protein obtained in

this way make it worthwhile?

>  Let's face it. We all love

> hydroponics, but successful commercial hydroponic crops are somewhat

> limited.  When you view the produce department at the supermarket, not

all

> that many items are raised hydroponically.  Raising fish adds a

wonderful

> new dimension and hopefully we can add more fish species to our

aquaponic

> arsenal.  At least now you have better balanced aquaponic meal.  We

just

> need a starch.  Rice grows well in aquaponic systems if you want to

strive

> for the ideal.  Jim R.

Agree with all this too but am trying to work out whether it's best to

look to hydro or aqua as a primary, low impact method of food

production.

I have been looking for info on rice in hydro/aqua systems, do you - or

anyone else - have any info or links to info on this? Also still looking

for info on direct comparisons between system types if anyone knows of

any.

Thanks,

Barry

barrythomas@btinternet.com

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 5                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Tilapia Levity

From:    "Barry Thomas" 

Date:    Wed, 22 Sep 1999 01:24:39 +0100

> Based on your Tilapia feed observations and the aforementioned feats

of

> levitation and antigravity, it may be that Tilapia are designed by the

> Creator to act as biochemical-electromagnetic-gravitational lenses.

I had thought it a cunning solution by feed manufacturers to ensure

hygienic feeding practises - somewhat disapointed to hear that it is

merely a miracle of Creation.  :)

Barry

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 6                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Tilapia Levity

From:    Marc & Marcy 

Date:    Tue, 21 Sep 1999 19:31:26 -0600

> Tedzo.( * )

> One who walks with two feets of levity, and a head full of gravity.

> (So I guess that means I float upside down, unless accompanied by Tilapia).

A floater? Eh? :>

Marc

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 7                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Tilapia Levity

From:    "James Bell" 

Date:    Tue, 21 Sep 1999 21:24:54 -0400

 I would  love to  see  some  of  the  genetics  you  are  growing and

consuming

.------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------.

| Message 8                                                           |

'------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------'

Subject: Re: Tilapia Levity

From:    "TGTX" 

Date:    Tue, 21 Sep 1999 21:19:05 -0500

> A floater? Eh? :>

> Marc

Marc, I learned long ago that the claim that "cream rises" (in this old

world) might be far surpassed by the well known fact that "scum

floats"...(speaking of levity and the like)

Alas, we have diverged from the semi-serious to the sociological.....

Y'all have a good weekend.

Tedzilla.



Back to Index